|
Don’t Give up on
Audio DRM!
Originally March 2007, Updated January 2008
In this
article I discuss the reasons for Audio DRMs failure to date, the
consequences this has had, and I propose a solution. This article challenges the conventional
viewpoint that Audio DRM is dead and buried forever.
Intro
The year 1997 saw the release of Winamp, the first major software program
for playing MP3 files and ripping CDs on the PC. The first hard drive
digital audio players (DAPs) also began to appear that year. In late 1999
the first music filesharing network, Napster, was released and the
popularity of digital music playback on personal computers rose rapidly. DAP
popularity took off with the 2001 release of the stylish and easy to use
Apple iPod, which supported both MP3 files and a newer higher quality format
called MP4 / AAC. Today, the iPod remains by far the most popular DAP, and
it has replaced personal computers as the most popular playback tool people
use to listen to digital music.
In 2003 Apple, working with the record companies, opened the iTunes Music
Store
selling digital music protected by DRM. Enjoying a near monopoly, Apple
naturally chose a proprietary DRM format which locked consumers into Apple
Hardware & Software.
In 2004 Microsoft followed with the competing PlaysForSure DRM which was
supported by a number of non apple devices and manufacturers. Sony tried a
DRM of its own which was later abandoned. Microsoft created yet another DRM
for its Zune player in 2007. Nevertheless, the iPod's domination of the market
has left all these competing DRMs so far largely irrelevant.
Even Apple’s market leading iTunes store selling DRM protected music remains
relatively unpopular in term of sales. A recent study calculated that
despite years of dramatically falling CD sales, the UK average spend per
head of population on digital audio downloads comes to just 79 pence
annually. Today most users download, or swap with friends, illegal audio
copies. Even scanning physical CDs remains more popular than buying digital
tracks online. The old mp3 format, the only format shared by all players
(both DAP and computer), dominates the market.
Consumer complaints about Apple’s DRM include: (a) The music files can only
be played on an iPod or in the iTunes program. (b) At 128kbps the iTunes DRM
files play at significantly below CD Quality. (c) By ripping an existing CD
or obtaining an mp3 from the internet etc the consumer can obtain the same
product in a more convenient unlocked format for only a modicum of effort
and no cost.
Audio DRM was dealt another hefty blow when programs recently came onto the
market that allow consumers to break into the Apple and Microsoft DRMs and
convert them into unprotected files. These DRMs are both rather insecure, but
the fact remains that although it is possible to encrypt data a perfect DRM
is difficult to achieve. Even decrypting the data inside a conventional
Smart Card can not provide protection because the data has to leave the card
and pass onto a decompression algorithm and a Digital to Analogue Converter
- and at this point the data could be intercepted. Eavesdropping HD DVD
signals, for example, is deterred by kernel mode drivers and HDCP compliant
digital connectors, but these complicated techniques struggle to provide
real security. The highest levels of security would only be possible only by
embedding a Secure Cryptoprocessor / Decompression / DAC chip with
tamper-resistant properties and only analogue outputs into the device. A
pirate could still make an analogue recording in real time, but that is a
less significant threat.
Apple has recently responded to these challenges by beginning to sell DRM
free tracks on iTunes. In addition, a handful of companies have started
selling DRM free music (some, such as ALLOFMP3.COM, illegally).
However, it is not clear that DRM is at fault for the low sales so much as
the easy availability of free music. A band called Radiohead ran an
experiment allowing fans to choose how much they were willing to pay for the
chance to download the latest Radiohead album DRM free. 66% of fans choose
to pay nothing, and the rest choose an average fee of $6 which was still
well below the CD price.
Consequences
Widespread copying
has so desensitized the average man that he now no longer considers piracy
immoral, and has on the contrary even began to find dubious justifications
for it's righteousness. For example, increasingly consumers have begun to
believe that free music is a right and intellectual property laws are out of
date.
As a result of the massive revenue falls, large record companies are
beginning to abandon less popular artists in an effort to cut costs. From
the Guardian Newspaper:
An acclaimed indie band will next month leap into the unknown by becoming
the first established act to give away an entire album for nothing in a move
which could spark a music industry revolution.
Convinced that changes in the industry and the spread of digital piracy have
made it ever more difficult to make money from selling records, the Crimea
plan to turn the economics on their head by giving away downloads of their
self-financed second album, Secrets of the Witching Hour.
By giving away the album in its entirety on May 13, the band hope to widen
their fanbase and ultimately make more money from touring, merchandising and
licensing deals than they would from sales of the album.
Despite selling a respectable 35,000 copies of their debut album, Tragedy
Rocks, and making the top 40 with the single Lottery Winners On Acid, the
band were last year dropped by their record label, Warner Music.
Like its major-label rivals, it [Warner] is struggling with the structural
changes to the record industry and, say critics, is increasingly unable to
invest in long-term artist development.
The experiment is being watched closely by the industry and other artists
struggling with the conundrum of how to make money at a time when CD sales
are collapsing...
Only very popular artists offer the potential for alternative sources of
revenue - live converts, TV shows, merchandising sales for example. Another
cost cutting technique we see today is the production of mass market music
which is churned out by record industry experts using previously unknown and
therefore inexpensive artists.
In summary, declining sales are clearly having a vastly negative impact on the music
industry - and farsighted people will realize that reversing this tide is
extremely important.
Proposal
I believe DRM is a vital technology and it can and must be made to work.
In order for Music DRM to succeed it needs to offer the consumer an
experience over and above what is possible by scanning CDs or downloading
mp3 files from file sharing web sites. It should include the following
features:
(a) An extremely rich music tag and album art format which hugely exceeds
anything available today. For example scrolling song words even Karaoke
mode, images on every track, possibly video clips, long descriptive text and
background articles.
(b) Music sourced from 24bit 96kHz recordings which can be advertised as
offering the consumer
"better than CD quality sound".
It should also support these features:
(c) Both Music Purchase and Music Subscription models. To date music
subscription services such as Rhapsody To Go (which offers access to a vast
CD library of popular music with unlimited playback and copying to a DAP all
for a fixed monthly fee of $15) have not proved popular because they do not
support the market leading iPod. However, many believe music subscription is
the way forward and would work if available on the iPod. A very secure DRM
will be essential. For the consumers all the music in the world would be on
hand without the hassle of CD scanning or finding pirate files on the Web,
also hardware compatibility becomes much less of an issue.
From Apple's point of view it frees them from competition
with music sellers such as Amazon, strengthens their monopoly because they
can force a better subscription deal on the record companies compared to
smaller competitors, and encourages users towards higher capacity machines.
(d) Generous rights to play back the music on a number of devices with a
minimum of inconvenience (eg a portable player would need to be connect to
the internet only once a month, for example, to validate it’s usage rights).
(e) For music purchase: playback on a variety of devices made by a variety of manufacturer and
including portable Mp3 players and home players such as the Squeezebox or
Apple TV.
(f) For music purchased: the files are backed up for the user so he can never loose them and they
are available for him to download at any level of compression (so he can
install high quality large files on a home device and lower quality files on
a portable device).
(g) A user friendly environment. Eg: Rather than multiple files stored in
different directories a simple install of an album onto the device, also
without home scanning there is no need for tag editing.
also:
(h) The DRM should probably include a Secure Cryptoprocessor / Decompression
/ DAC chip with tamper-resistant properties. The focus should be on hardware
devices - avoid the issues around computer playback and building user
friendly PC software applications. Microsoft & Apple will resist such a move
(especially a focus on hardware devices instead of PCs) - the initiative
needs to taken by record companies. Sony is the natural choice, but their
long history of trying to lock consumers into proprietary technology would
have to be overcome.
(i) Ideally the enhanced rich tag digital format should be made available only inside DRM
protected files with technical details kept secret. In this way a pirate
file (perhaps made from an analogue recoding) with the same rich tags and
audio quality could never be circulated.
Unlike the Apple iTunes DRM this offers the consumer something superior to
anything available today. Indeed a DRM such as this one could create a
new renaissance in the music industry as music sales explode. Meanwhile the
industry does little. It is clear that the commercial world suffers as badly
as the general public from a lack of vision and talent, and that CEOs such
as Steve Jobs who built the stylish and easy to use iPod are in the
minority.
A final note on security: Audio DRM has the potential to offer a very high
level of protection, electronic books which need to be read on computers and
have searchable text are a much more difficult problem. Aggressive action on piracy and
the creation of new laws is of course a vital element of the DRM concept.
It's unacceptable that software that breaks into a DRM be allowed to go on
sale (as has occurred to the weak Apple and Microsoft formats).
Protecting intellectual property is vital to both the economic and creative
heath of nations. Preventing copyright infringement of digital material
(Digital Rights Management) is one of the greatest IT challenges we now
face. Digital Music has been the first major test, more will follow.
|